Ad
www.evertiq.com
Free newsletter (more)

Tin whiskers may have caused Toyota recalls

An expert on electromagnetic interference has been approached by the US government to give an independent assessment of the problems that have been the cause of a massive recall of Toyota cars.

February 22 2010, 2:07 PM

OEMTechEye claims that they have seen a document written by EMI (electro magnetic interference) expert Keith Armstrong, saying that the Toyota recall due to sticking pedals is only a smokescreen. In the document, Armstrong said he was contacted by the US government's National Highway Traffic Safety agency to discuss the EMI implications that could have caused unintended acceleration.

Armstrong said that tests performed by the motor industry, by the US government and the Japanese government show it's almost impossible to stop a runaway vehicle with the brakes. If EMI is involved in an incident, it will not leave any traces. He said that if electronic circuits, software or firmware in cars go full throttle or is exposed to another error, there could not be more stress seen than if it was behaving normally. The cause of the fault is then undetectable afterwards.

Armstrong said that manufacturers are denying that EMI could have caused the sudden acceleration, but that view is logically unsound. He said that this is a "bankrupt argument" and that any competent design engineer knows this. Complex electronic systems are hard to make reliable enough for safety. He also claimed that electronics systems in automobiles do not use the same safety principles that are common in other industries. The standard for functional safety is IEC 61508[2], but the auto industry is lagging behind and has only just produced the first draft of its own version of the standard.

Armstrong said that lead free soldering also can be a problem and can cause tin whiskers to grow, which can cause short circuits. This problem has earlier caused serious problems in the computer industry. He concludes that software also can be affected by EMI and can cause instability to electronic circuits, according to Techeye.

Comments

8. Widespread major design flaw?
March 23, 2010
07:57
I agree that is a misleading title. It is controversial but engine heat accelerate whisker growth, but why would it happen to certain models and years. The whole industry uses tin plating. On EMI, the most likely source is probably the system itself, such as the car electrical system.
I think one major issue with modern automotive design is that they have been making it easier for stupid to drive, or to drive stupidly. E.g, I have ABS and good breaks so I can follow three feet behind at 70MPH.

Greg
7. We had failures due to s...
March 22, 2010
08:15
We had failures due to shorting by whiskers, which are hard to see with the naked eye.
They usually ocurred after six month of manufacture.
Mechanically shock the part and the whiskers will fall off.

6. misleading headline
March 15, 2010
08:12
tin whisker don't go away after a crash. it generally takes years for tin whisker to cause a problem. It is highly unlikely that tin whisker are any more than a red herring here.

Dave
5. The article title is mis...
March 12, 2010
07:55
The article title is misleading... tin whiskers is an electrical phenomenom which can cause shorting but it is distinctly different from electromagnetic interference or EMI... I could envision a potential failure mode for each.

4. Does anyone whoi respond...
March 02, 2010
16:18
Does anyone whoi responded to this article know what "Tin Whiskers" are? I do and your responses do not make any sense. Please read and then read again to justify a response which is relevant

3. and people wonder why th...
February 24, 2010
10:32
and people wonder why the airlines ask people to turn off their portable electronic devices on takeoff and landing

2. All electronic component...
February 24, 2010
10:32
All electronic components which go into a vehicle must meet very strict EMI standards and are tested at both component and vehicle level. This prevents any unusual behaviour when say driving past a TV tower, making a phone call, or operating bluetooth for example. Unless the vehicle was exposed to some massive amount of EMI from some unknown source, I don't see this as being a possible issue. Perhaps it fits in with the increased solar activity which threw GPS systems off earlier this month????

1. Agreed
February 23, 2010
07:51
I completely agree with this independent study, if you take certain devices like all of use on a daily basis (blackberries, 2-way radios, PDAs, Laptops etc) all of these can induce interference onto the data lines of a complex computer system. In this case, I would study a vast amount of different cell phones and devices while testing a Toyota. You will likely find some devices to emit more interference than others.. But all it takes is that right frequency to be absorbed into the computers electronics and it will lock-up or actuate in an undesirable way. Shielding and filtering must not be sufficient in these designs and allows them to be interfered with. Once the crash has happened and the car is switched off, everything returns to the perfect state and Toyota says "Nothing is wrong" .. "Driver error". Experiment with some devices, Im sure you will find what you are looking for.

Mark

This news is closed for comments.

Ad
1 2 3 4
Build: 2010-08-26 12:50, # 117